How coronavirus compares to flu, Ebola, other outbreaks

National Geographic creates a chart to explain the comparison


The coronavirus has spread around the world, but is this new virus less or more dangerous than other infectious diseases? The National Geographic created a chart on its website to explain how they compare.

Health officials and regular citizens set their priorities based on the general risk to the public. This week, the World Health Organization announced plans to spend $675 million on the month-old outbreak of coronavirus.

By contrast, the agency has raised a third of this amount from international partners to combat Ebola in central Africa, which has been spreading since August 2018.

Comparing these outbreaks involves factors like how contagious a disease is versus fatalities and severe outcomes, versus the socioeconomic ramifications of locking down a region, according to the article.

Read the article and chart.



February 19, 2020


Topic Area: Infection Control


Recent Posts

UF Health Hospitals Rely on Green Globes to Realize Their Full Potential

Case study: The process encouraged the team to push themselves in several areas.


How Healthcare Facilities Can Be Truly Disaster-Resilient

Real resilience looks different than what’s written down in plans


TriasMD Breaks Ground on DISC Surgery Center for San Fernando Valley

It is set to open in Q3 2025


Bigfork Valley Hospital Falls Victim to Data Breach

The incident occurred in November 2024


AI-Driven Facilities: Strategic Planning and Cost Management 

6 factors to ensure infrastructure, operations and financial management support AI’s integration


 
 


FREE Newsletter Signup Form

News & Updates | Webcast Alerts
Building Technologies | & More!

 
 
 


All fields are required. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.